hostile yoga?

topic posted Wed, November 26, 2008 - 9:38 AM by  Margot
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
I wanted to point out that I have noticed more petty ego struggles on yoga-related tribes than anywhere else on tribe. I noticed a lot of hostility and uptightness among posters (not directed to me) when I posted a popular question (so much that I actually considered deleting the topic just to shut people up). I am noticing it in other threads too. What's up with that? Is it normal for hardcore yogis/yoginis to be so harsh to each other?
posted by:
Margot
India
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Wed, November 26, 2008 - 9:53 AM
    oh wow

    I am sorry to see that you feel that way.

    There are so many good words spoken on here.
    I have noticed the lack of posting on these tribes lately.
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Wed, November 26, 2008 - 10:14 AM
    Margot - Most of the conflicts that are so obvious on tribe are around belief systems (and then conflate into personality wars). For some people yoga is a fundamentalist religion with very rigid rules about men and women's places, etc. For others it's a religion but a very gnostic or new age one. For others it's an individual spiritual path and for others it's a secular activity. Yoga is many things to many people - many of us consider our "thing" to be the most important (it's human nature, we can be conscious of it or allow it to unconsciously guide our actions). Lots of gurus also throw poo at each other or swing their atomic balls around, there's quite a bit of competition in yoga (it is, after all, a business for many people and few gurus are devoid of ego). There's also the East=good/West=bad dualistic conflict inherent in many people's beliefs, which adds to the whole conflict stew (beef, not even vaguely vegetarian! ;-). So, yes, it is "normal" despite seeming to conflict with a lot of the common precepts of yoga and being a peaceful person.

    I pop in now and then but don't even click on a lot of the threads anymore. A lot of tribe is pretty trollerific though since it's also a place where companies and individuals promote their businesses in both obvious and stealth ways. Much to my surprise, I found out that tribe was originally meant to be more about promoting burner's businesses than a social networking site - it made it all make much more sense to me because I thought it was meant to mainly be a social networking site! There's a lot of promotion and selling that goes on in the yoga tribes too (not surprisingly since there are a lot of MLM schemes that attach themselves to yoga).
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Wed, November 26, 2008 - 10:40 AM
    margot humans are monkeys that drive cars, dont forget this and think that we're anything more than that ...
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: hostile yoga?

      Wed, November 26, 2008 - 11:01 AM
      <<<<"humans are monkeys that drive cars, dont forget this and think that we're anything more than that">>>>............speak for yourself monkey
      • Re: hostile yoga?

        Wed, November 26, 2008 - 12:00 PM
        I'm not sure if SynerGuy was trying to be provocative since many arguments in this tribe have revolved around human animal vs divine being of light.

        Technically, we're apes not monkeys. This ape doesn't drive a car and is very fond of her bonobo cousins.
        • Re: hostile yoga?

          Wed, November 26, 2008 - 12:05 PM
          I think SynerGuy was just having a sense of humour, which is exactly what I have noticed lacking in all these yoga tribes! Everyone's taking themselve's way too seriously!
          • Re: hostile yoga?

            Wed, November 26, 2008 - 12:13 PM
            Margot - Quite possibly, I don't know SynerGuy so it's hard for me to know his intent or what tone he's taking :-) People do tend to take their belief systems extremely seriously - and there's quite a bit of evangelizing and fishing for followers by self-declared gurus that's gone on in the All Yoga tribe over the years - so I suspect that's part of what's led to the tribe being what it is. People do also tend to come in and try to remake it to fit their purposes rather than respect the "all" part of All Yoga. I certainly don't claim total innocence for myself. I do have my own hobbyhorses and things I consider it important to speak up about, being a human animal and all ;-)
          • K
            K
            online 58

            Re: hostile yoga

            Wed, November 26, 2008 - 12:19 PM
            I know that some of us get upset when a nerve gets hit. For me and for Fifi (yes, I'm going to speak for you here), it's when we sense misogyny, or any flagrant or even latent discrimination towards women. Some of that definitely stems from cultural differences, but I think those differences helps us all to learn the world is very diverse. For me, reading some of the posts from people I disagree with has helped me greater appreciate the benefits of being a woman in a Western society (though universal and equitable health care would be nice!!!) and it's made me appreciate some of the in-person communities I participated in.

            I am "guilty" of using tribe to promote my trips, workshops and books, but have tried to respect it and put things in their proper place. That is why I believe the Events and Listings features are there--for small businesses to get exposure when they can't afford to advertise in, say, Yoga Journal.
            • Re: hostile yoga

              Wed, November 26, 2008 - 12:38 PM
              Kimberlee - I'm happy for you to talk for me in this case (and would be in many others :-) Not that my personal take on this is terribly important or should be definitive in any way but I don't think there's any issue with someone who participates here and we know talking about their classes or workshops. It's the hard sell and fishing for devotees with no respect for the ALL yoga part of the tribe title that I find myself having difficulties with and why I no longer participate here much.
              • Re: hostile yoga

                Wed, November 26, 2008 - 2:12 PM
                This was brave.

                I remember posting here with a question a while ago and getting one saintly humourless know-it-all answer.
    • Re: hostile yoga?

      Wed, November 26, 2008 - 4:08 PM
      nothing more than humor intended as margot was saying
      • K
        K
        online 58

        Re: hostile yoga?

        Wed, November 26, 2008 - 6:28 PM
        "I remember posting here with a question a while ago and getting one saintly humourless know-it-all answer. "

        Doubt it was me, I might be a know-it-all, but saintly is an adjective that no one has ever applied to me.
        • Le
          Le
          offline 58

          Re: hostile yoga?

          Thu, November 27, 2008 - 2:41 AM
          Whenever I see a thread descending into a pointless flame war, I either just ignore the whole thread, start my own, or only read/respond to the posts that haven't resorted to high school-style drama as a means of advancing the discussion.
        • Re: hostile yoga?

          Thu, November 27, 2008 - 5:46 AM
          Kimberlee - who knows who it was, I'd assume that The Eniad isn't popping in to be hostile or stir the pot by pointing the finger or she would have pointed the finger! I'd assume since she stuck around for longer threads and is still here that she gets *something* constructive from this tribe, flawed as it is.

          A thing that's useful to remember regarding communication and conflict on teh internets is that we don't have tone of voice in a written medium and so we *project* or *fill in* that part of communication and interpret accordingly. How we read an answer also has to do with our own expectations, prejudices and prejudgments - what WE bring to the table. I've found that sometimes when someone at first appears hostile to me that it's a matter of miscommunication and that with just a little bit of effort we're able to understand each other. That, of course, doesn't mean that it's not entirely possible to just not get along with someone or our projection to be too powerful or neurotic to recognize as our own or that someone isn't trying to force their belief system on you and angry you won't submit to their desires. We're all just people, though that's easy to forget when we're not face to face and feel passionately about a topic or a conversation challenges our beliefs. (And we do get visitors who consider themselves superior to others but that's no different than dealing with a diverse group of people at a yoga workshop.)
          • Re: hostile yoga?

            Thu, November 27, 2008 - 7:06 AM
            please don't talk about others as hostile!


            first off it's Thanksgiving

            secondly it's plain not nice

            finally ENIAD is not a hostiel type/

            GEESCHJ
            • Re: hostile yoga?

              Thu, November 27, 2008 - 7:28 AM
              Um, this thread is about hostility in yoga and we're just discussing the subject. I'm not attacking ENIAD, I don't know her and have only seen her post a couple of threads here but I do know she's participated in a couple of threads so obviously had more experiences here and hopefully some of them were pleasurable. (I suspect most of us have had experiences where we felt someone was being unpleasant with us in this tribe!) I said I doubted The Eniad was being hostile so clearly I'm not accusing her of being hostile (I can't be 100% sure since I'm not her which is why I didn't say I'm sure).

              Please don't read this thread if you find the subject matter upsetting! The only thing any of us really have control over is ourselves and our own experiences. May you enjoy the rest of your day celebrating American thanksgiving (it's not thanksgiving for either myself or The Eniad - I noticed she lives in Quebec as well....enjoy the snow today The Eniad! :-)
              • K
                K
                online 58

                Re: hostile yoga?

                Thu, November 27, 2008 - 9:15 AM
                I wasn't attacking her either. It was a very lame attempt at self-effacing humor.
                • Re: hostile yoga?

                  Thu, November 27, 2008 - 9:27 AM
                  teh internets - it's like on big bag of flat jokes and shards of funhouse mirrors! I do find it useful to remember that when I get a "feeling" from someone's posts that the actual feeling is my own even if it's triggered by something I interpret as being positive or negative. I'm human of course so don't do this perfectly or all the time but I find that when I remember this I have a much more pleasant experience of the world in general (and I have no need to control other people as a means to influence my own interior emotional landscape - work in progess, of course! :-)
                • Re: hostile yoga?

                  Thu, November 27, 2008 - 10:30 AM
                  Sorry if my comment ended up putting you in a bad light in cathyq's eyes or causing your comment to be interpreted incorrectly. Apparently it's difficult to discuss hostility without hostility erupting!
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: hostile yoga?

                    Thu, November 27, 2008 - 8:41 PM
                    oops opened a can of worms here perhaps? ANd in the teaching tribe too?

                    I just wanted to point out to you all as an outsider how silly you all seem being hostile toward each other. That's not what eneded up happening and I apologise for even bringing it up .
                    • Re: hostile yoga?

                      Fri, November 28, 2008 - 5:24 AM
                      Margot - Not to worry, the can was already open, you merely pointed to the obvious. I've never experienced another online yoga forum that was like this one, it really does tend to be a mix of people with their personal agendas...for better or worse. For my part, I make no claims to be anything but another human doing their imperfect best. I try to remember that people are usually being hostile because they're in pain or afraid of pain. However, sometimes being compassionate involves asserting a boundary or merely removing oneself from a situation. Some days that's quite easy to do, some days not so much. The reality about online communication is that miscommunication often happens due to the nature of the medium and people often greatly misinterpret tone and meaning. We all come in contact with many people we may never come in contact with in our everyday lives so that creates even more potential for lack of common ground (and also for practicing patience and compassion since clearly none of us have perfected that aspect of yoga! ;-). While yoga may seem like common ground, it's actually often a root of conflict in this tribe (as warring belief systems often are in real life). Add in that the whole of tribe is pretty trollerific and that not everyone who joins All Yoga does so because they're tolerant of all kinds of yoga and you have a lot of potential for conflict. I don't mind having difficult conversations because I understand they're often necessary to get to the roots of conflict and resolve it. I respect people who make the effort so your attempt was noble and appreciated by me.

                      So what would the ideal All Yoga tribe look like to you? And how do you think it could be achieved?
    • Re: hostile yoga?

      Fri, November 28, 2008 - 8:27 AM
      Actually chimpanzees can drive cars too. ;-)
      • Re: hostile yoga?

        Fri, November 28, 2008 - 8:33 AM
        Ryan - True, chimps can drive little tiny cars and apes sometimes get them to because us apes do - sometimes - enjoy laughing at ourselves (or ourselves as represented by our monkey cousins). Banana anyone?
        • Re: hostile yoga?

          Fri, November 28, 2008 - 9:08 AM
          For my part, I approach people who practice yoga as humans. While it's tempting to blame other people, I do understand that communication involves two people and both are responsible for how a conversation unfolds. (Of course, we all also have personal ideas about what is honest, polite, appropriate or whatever that we learn and accept as "how it should be" - as well as tolerance for differing opinions and desire to dig deeply into an idea or concept as well.) We all have a tendency to assume that because we know and understand what we mean, that our meaning and/or intent should be clear to others. Of course, language is inexact, words often have more than one meaning and tone changes meaning (and we project tone onto the words of others when we read them) - that's BEFORE we even start comparing our subjective perspectives, which we may or may not believe to be more valid than those of others. Sometimes I think it's amazing when we DO understand each other. I appreciate all the great conversations I've had here and the wisdom people have shared - it's why I'm still a member. I've also met many lovely people in this tribe over my time on tribe. We do have a choice about what we put into and get out of this tribe, each and every one of us who participates contributes to the whole...for better and worse.
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Fri, November 28, 2008 - 8:27 AM
    I looked back at the orginal question and that is all which I am addressing righ tnow.

    I don't think that most devoted yoga practitioners are snippy, hostile or even hardcore.

    I think most yoga practitioners are practicing yoga and caring lives.

    I think the hostility you are referring to for the most part comes from onely one or two people.

    It may be that with little discussion on tribe on a whole lately that people who used to get interesting discussions goign are now settleing for getting responses by being mean.. as in better to have some attention than none.

    I am wavering with my tribe involvement. I have appreciated so much for so long, I am sorry to see it be so infrequented. I am developing other habits and means for expression.

    I do invite my friends to keep in touch with me via PM as I am not going to tribes much anymore.. no one else seems to either.
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Fri, November 28, 2008 - 10:35 AM
    "...I have noticed more petty ego struggles on yoga-related tribes than anywhere else on tribe"

    Nah, check out the burningman tribes, they often get way worse.

    Used to be on some birdwatching message boards about ten years ago that REALLY got abusive.

    Some people with hardcore social hangups join group stuff, then the anonymity (sp?) of the web brings out the douchebaggery in 'em.
    • Re: hostile yoga?

      Fri, November 28, 2008 - 11:04 AM
      Willy - "Used to be on some birdwatching message boards about ten years ago that REALLY got abusive."

      Heh, I suspect it's just as much about how the more specialized a group is and the more passionate/attached members are to something, the more likely there is to be conflict. I mean, no one much cares to argue about how many millimeters a duck billed boobies' wings are unless they're really really into it and it's their "thing". If something is our "thing" (which gives us social status, a sense of belonging, accomplishment or whatever), we're pretty heavily invested in it as part of our identity and concept of who/what we are - this can make disagreements about facts or ideas get conflated with person attacks and insults. I, of course, exclude myself from none of this, being human and all :-)
  • Re: hostile yoga?

    Fri, November 28, 2008 - 12:56 PM
    Dear Margot
    I think I have a crush on you. Whip me with a wet noodle.
    Love briggi
    born year of the Monkey
    • Re: hostile yoga?

      Fri, November 28, 2008 - 2:14 PM
      itis a real trial to be so much smarter than everyone else and also have to be human
      • Re: hostile yoga?

        Sat, November 29, 2008 - 3:44 PM
        cathyq,

        C'mon now, no picking on Fifi. We want her to feel welcome, don't we?

        So here's my question. If someone has generated some negative feelings, is it better to express or suppress them? I think a lot of yoga is about cleansing ourselves from afflictive emotions, but some negative feelings may be legitimate, don't you think?

        Sam
        • Re: hostile yoga?

          Sat, November 29, 2008 - 5:36 PM
          Know it all Hostility..? Try the Enlightenment 101 tribe! That's a free for all Ego-Fest. All in the name of Enlightenment no less. Irony prevails everywhere and no matter how saintly us Yogis try or appear to be, certain people will almost always rub us the wrong way. And people that say things which we don't like or.. don't / aren't ready to hear. Here and in the 'real world'.

          I agree w/ Sam about there being a place for negative expression too. And I agree that our reactions are our own..to own : ) which ain't always easy.

          Margot, I'm surprised and elated that no one tried to nail you to a cross for saying what you said. Glad you opened it up as an opportunity for all of us to keep our spotless ego's in check : )

          K
          • Re: hostile yoga?

            Sun, November 30, 2008 - 2:05 PM
            I think we have to differentiate some types of negativity from others. It's one thing to become irritated or annoyed at someone and to let them know about it. In that case, a sharp-witted barb may be completely appropriate, or even helpful. But it is something else to speak or act from ego or jealousy or anger and with the intent to hurt someone. That's what we need to stop.

            Sam
            • K
              K
              online 58

              Re: hostile yoga?

              Sun, November 30, 2008 - 6:00 PM
              If you don't like it, change it.

              You can create your own group. As moderator you can invite people you like, exclude people you don't like, and delete posts you find distasteful.

              I am in no way trying to kick people out, nor directing this at just one person, but just suggesting that creating your own group seems more productive than tossing around the the negative labels that were used in the "scented oils" thread and this one.
              • Re: hostile yoga?

                Mon, December 1, 2008 - 12:49 AM
                This is the kind of useless hostility I am talking about.
                • Re: hostile yoga?

                  Mon, December 1, 2008 - 6:55 AM
                  Margot - Could you be more specific about what you consider to be an example of useless hostility? Are you sure that's the person's intent or do you think you also play a role as the person interpreting the words? What expectations are you bringing to this tribe? What is your ideal for this tribe and how to you think it can be achieved? And what do you consider useful hostility or when do you consider hostility useful?
              • Unsu...
                 

                Re: hostile yoga?

                Mon, December 1, 2008 - 8:14 AM
                So here, according to Marshall Rosenberg's non-violent communication theories as I understand them, this is Kimberlee making a suggestion about what strategy Margot could employ so Margot could get her needs met, rather than listening to her feelings and needs behind what is being said.

                It contains a judgement which is a slightly nicer sounding than "should" yet the violent word should is not said. In this case, it sounds like the focus here is on "fixing" Margot's "problem" and therefore accounts for why Margot responded the way she did to it.

                Part of what happens online is the misunderstood use of the word "but". But refutes what was just said- i.e. "she is beautiful, but tall." means she's not beautiful because she's tall.

                In Kimberlee's statement: "I am in no way trying to kick people out, nor directing this at just one person, but just suggesting that creating your own group seems more productive than tossing around the the negative labels..." Basically says to Margot that, yes, she's saying Margot should be kicked out and she's directing this comment at her specifically, and also in her need is that these conversations be "productive". This is going up to the head and evaluating the merits of Margot's plea for better communication, and doesn't 'feel' good for Margot.

                So the feeling part of Margot is now just hearing those evaluative statements, and not the factual reminder that Margot could build a wall around her feelings by creating her own group. It's not clear that this building of walls is "productive", either, given that what is needed is listening to feelings and needs behind what people are saying, rather than needing to fix something.

                I think it's clear that Kimberlee didn't intend to give Margot a bad feeling. My focus is on the mechanics of how this works with languaging in an attempt to bring both the hearing of Margot's feelings and needs, respecting everyone else's feelings and needs, and trying to show how violent communication can happen so easily online. Yoga is union, therefore, as a yoga teacher, my focus is on teaching or reflecting things to people in a such a way as to bring about some oneness internally or externally.

                Subsequently, she is asked by Fifi some good direct questions, although not specifically pointing to her feelings and needs, she's essentially asked to examine them, yet in a fairly factual (left-brained) manner, when feelings are what are at hand here and clearly triggering Margot.

                Please please read or listen to Marshall Rosenberg.

                Om,
                DurgaDas
                • Re: hostile yoga?

                  Mon, December 1, 2008 - 8:31 AM
                  I hear that you feel you need to speak up about and promote Marshall Rosenberg because it's important to you and you have found it useful for yourself. I hear that you believe in it and practice it and believe others should too.

                  Sadly, I've found people that promote Rosenberg and non-violent communication on tribe actually seem to want to impose it upon others and so far I've found the people who promote it to be very poor listeners and quite disrespectful of others in their desire to impose their belief system on others. So far, no one who's promoted this that I've run across on tribe treats this as a technique, they treat is as a religion and become quite evangelical. I've actually experienced more open and hidden hostility from people who espouse this technique than many who just speak honestly as themselves.

                  So, please hear that I am not interested in engaging using a technique I find to be problematic for a number of reasons but I respect that you have found it useful for yourself and respect your right to communicate in a way that you feel reflects who you are or would like to be. I would ask you respectfully to please not use me as an illustration while doing so, though please feel free to use yourself and your own experiences to illustrate your points. Of course, if others wish to engage with you using the beliefs and techniques you're promoting, I am happy to recuse myself from the conversation so you may proceed with people interested in engaging with you in the manner which you prefer and choose for yourself.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    K
                    K
                    online 58

                    Re: hostile yoga?

                    Mon, December 1, 2008 - 11:46 AM
                    Margot, first, my suggestion was in no way hostile, but rather pointing out that continuing to get frustrated and trying to change other people (or get them to leave the group) is an exercise in futility. By pointing out that it's useless to is not being hostile. I was saying that everyone has the power create something new, so just do it already. In fact, I already started one myself.

                    Like I said, it was not directed at any one person, so I regret that you took it personally. There are people in this group that have been expressing disappointment in the group for a long time now. There are probably lots of people in this group that have been so intimidated by the personality feuds and the name-calling that they feel too intimidated to post. This is also a suggestion to them that they take action and create a group in which they will feel more comfortable actively participating.
                    • K
                      K
                      online 58

                      Re: hostile yoga?

                      Mon, December 1, 2008 - 11:50 AM
                      Crap, forgive my typo, I should have said: By pointing out that it's useless is not being hostile.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    K
                    K
                    online 58

                    Re: hostile yoga?

                    Mon, December 1, 2008 - 11:49 AM
                    DurgaDas, I appreciate your input, but I was, and I will repeat, in no way talking to Margot directly. Please do not turn this into a she said/she said, because my comment was not for her but for everyone who feels extraordinarily frustrated here.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Unsu...
                     

                    Re: hostile yoga?

                    Tue, December 2, 2008 - 12:24 PM
                    Sorry for stepping on your trigger, and I am not evangelical, just passionate. I respect your wishes.

                    I am simply concerned with the mechanics of how things work in communication and how they don't. I am interested in the ways in which we find ourselves in or not when communicating.

                    To be clear I don't feel the need to speak up about the "Church of Rosenberg". It's good information, and helpful as a way of seeing communication in a way that meets with ahimsa, the fundamental principle of Yoga. There is a lot more about communication than merely this, yet I find it quite interesting that someone would attempt to impose it upon others, as this is clearly NOT according to the principles NVC clearly espouses. Non-violence is the way I am simply living my life and it seems people could use more of it in our world.

                    This again brings up the point I made before about how things get removed from basic principles, among the endless examples of this. I am also saddened by this.

                    Om Shanti,
                    DurgaDas
                    www.silentmotion.org
                    • Re: hostile yoga?

                      Wed, December 3, 2008 - 7:05 AM
                      DurgaDas - I appreciate your good intentions. We are taking this a bit off topic (my excuses to others). No offense to your beliefs and no doubt the technique has much to offer when applied with a loving heart but many people seem to use it in a passive aggressive way which involves imposing subjective interpretations on others. For instance, your assumption regarding "stepping on your trigger". Also, the way you pulled out two people during a discussion involving many to analyse - accidental or not well thought out though it may be, this is a "technique" that is not ever going to generate peace or conflict resolution (so it may be worth going back to the drawing board since I've seen this commonly done by people espousing Rosenberg/NVC on tribe). It can be a form of passive aggression and singling people out never creates harmony, it's always a way to sow seeds of discord since it treats people unequally and rests upon the viewers value judgments being imposed rather than equal communication). I suspect quite a few people who use this technique (or do so in a way that's so obvious you can identify the "techniques") think they're acting as psychologists but unfortunately the training doesn't seem to include a good understanding of or training the most important aspect of a healthy therapeutic relationship - transference and counter transference, which lead to people projecting their own negative intentions and aggression on others...hence the passive aggressive nature of how many people seem to use Roserberg's techniques. Active listening also tends to be absent (but it's also hard to be an active listener when one is hearing echoes rather than what is actually being said). I suspect that sometimes people get more hung up on sounding or acting a certain way that being authentic because they believe it makes them a "good" person (therefore worthy of being loved). I'd be happy to explain a bit more why I spoke up if you're interested in knowing rather than working from assumptions (which, of course, involves your own biases as well as guesses at my intentions).

                      I hear that you believe that Rosenberg is part of or the same as yoga for you and therefore useful to bring up in this context. I also hear that it is something you value and is useful for you in your own life. (Please correct me if that isn't what you intended to express! :-) That's fantastic and I hope it continues to provide you with the skills you desire and feel are useful. I'm sure, like all things, how the techniques are used and manifest have as much to do with the person using them as the techniques. I am happy to talk to you person to person about this topic, we may have differing opinions, conclusions and insights. Yours are valid for you and your choices, as mine are for me and my choices.

                      I'm curious, was Rosenberg ever a practitioner of yoga or a member of any particular school of yoga?
                      • Unsu...
                         

                        Re: hostile yoga?

                        Wed, December 3, 2008 - 9:37 AM
                        Well, this thread has now ended my participation in this tribe. I am sorry if I offended you in any way. I will not be posting further here, as I cannot abide further dissection of my "harm" to this group vis a vis Fifi.

                        Om,
                        DurgaDas
                        • Re: hostile yoga?

                          Wed, December 3, 2008 - 9:55 AM
                          What a strange response! Unless DurgaDas was just looking for submission by the people he was pointing to and not discussion amongst equals about the technique he says he's here to practice. If non-violent communication just means denial of one's own aggression and projection of aggression onto the Other, I can see why it's not particularly effective.

                          Apparently DurgaDas mistook discussion of the technique he's (apparently) attached to for some form of personal criticism. Too bad. It does, however, reinforce my impression that this "non-violent communication" of this type that I've seen used is more about repression/conformity than learning how to actively listen and respect genuine individual to individual expression. Please take responsibility for your own actions rather than projecting your dissatisfaction upon me because I don't conform to your desires. Durga, you were the one who sought me out and explicitly used my name to get my attention and then avoided dialogue when it went off script! I look forward to seeing you reincarnated in new form as an new alt (and wave hello since I'm guessing I've met some of your other alts before).
              • Re: hostile yoga?

                Sat, December 13, 2008 - 11:39 AM
                "If you don't like it, change it. "

                I'm a little late to the party here, but I wanted to comment on this.

                It seems to me that language, even written language, can convey a certain tone. Even though the writer's stated intent was not hostile, it is easy to see how it could be interpreted that way. Tone is important in communication, and there are lot's of ways to soften the tone of a written communication, so that the language doesn't convey a wrong impression.

                Sam
                • Re: hostile yoga?

                  Sat, December 13, 2008 - 2:23 PM
                  "there are lot's of ways to soften the tone of a written communication, so that the language doesn't convey a wrong impression."

                  Unless it was their intent to convey it in the way they did.
            • Re: hostile yoga?

              Mon, December 1, 2008 - 11:55 AM
              wow

              this is slowly becomign more and more redundant and confusing.
              • K
                K
                online 58

                Re: hostile yoga?

                Mon, December 1, 2008 - 1:58 PM
                I will steal a quote that says what I was trying to say more eloquently.

                (Insert your deity here), grant me the serenity
                to accept the things I cannot change;
                the courage to change the things I can;
                and the wisdom to know the difference.
                • Unsu...
                   

                  Re: hostile yoga?

                  Mon, December 1, 2008 - 2:00 PM
                  Or as Hyde of the 70's Show use to say: "The ass kicking begins, where the zen ends!"

                  :D
                • the yoga hustle

                  Mon, December 1, 2008 - 2:01 PM
                  Once again it comes back to being responsible for our own experiences rather than trying to control our own emotions and thoughts by controlling others.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: hostile yoga?

    Sun, November 30, 2008 - 1:25 PM
    What an excellent post and comment, Margot. In your post, you speak of pettiness. I think people get petty because they are not getting their needs met, or their feelings have been hurt or cannot be expressed in a way that serves them and the reciever. Being reactive is quite rajasic.

    Much about how we are taught and re-inforced in society leads to these ego festivals you speak about here on tribe, but also elsewhere. Communication skills are the missing link I think.

    I also can empathize what I hear to be a sadness in your feelings that caused you to post this. It seems to be about this kind of violent communication and your desire to reach out to others who wish to share/improve or make non-violent our general way of communication in Tribe. I SO agree with this here and also interpersonally and intergovernmentally.

    I have had problems with communication for most of my life (as I am a bit Asperger's, VERY mildly expressed), and so recently I have come to grasp that my social awkwardness could be addressed by integrating Marshall Rosenberg's Non-Violent Communication principles. I STRONGLY recommend this to almost anyone I come in contact with now, as it spiritualizes speech, specifically the ahimsa portion of it VERY well. I have the audiobook version of these cds, and it's been one of the best things I have ever done. I have listened to them almost 4 complete run-throughs and also bought all the books he has recommended in there.

    Thinking about this some, I came to the conclusion that since we focus in NVC on feelings and needs, that the "Men are from Mars", "Women are from Venus" myth is more specifically addressed by what is focused on.

    Men, in communication, "tend" to focus on their needs and not their feelings, whereas women "tend" to focus on their feelings and not their needs. Therefore, some middle ground is needed there too, yet online none of this matters, everything is flattened, even if you have a picture up, clearly stating you are a woman or a man!

    Spiritual living, or spiritualizing life can begin with some form of yoga, but as I found out, even living in an ashram there isn't some concurrent skills of non-violent communication, or even listening skills to go with it.

    I posted on my articles page some thoughts on what I call The Seven Phases of Separation, and my theory is congruent with the main teachings of yoga and what I have recently grasped about how communication comes into the mix, which I think you are speaking about now.

    Online, as someone said earlier, it's easier to hear something wrong (and thus project our triggers onto the person writing), and this is mostly because we don't listen to the needs and feelings behind what has been said. Yoga seems quite good at teaching many things about how to get somewhere in one's own practice, yet I have found it to be the case that many people (oddly, often men) tend to lack some listening skills.

    This is also a pitta tendency. This is in general a rajasic tendency, and we have PLENTY of rajasic things to look at instead of sattvic things to look at in our current society. So many projections we have available to us, we cannot remember ourselves. Rajas is the projecting power of the mind, like the 'rose colored glasses'. Putting rajas into any of the four paths of yoga results in, respectively:

    Karma Yoga (I think *I* am the doer)
    Bhakti Yoga (My God is better than YOUR God, fanaticism)
    Raja Yoga (Look at MY yoga prowess, and my mind/body control)
    Jnana Yoga (*I* know more about this than YOU, or a general intellectual arrogance)

    So, it's the same problem as in all areas of life, and in all societies. ANY problem in society can be traced back to these seven factors, and depending on how far down the line one goes, it's severity is increased. I have heard it said that the first key to spiritual living is to stop taking things personally. Online you see a LOT of 'taking it personally'.

    Since it's only ego (i.e. left brain) that takes things personally, then this is a key operating factor. Since the right brain doesn't grasp that I am separate from ANYTHING, then one must school the left brain to think in terms given to it by the right brain. Again, the balance comes. Balance is my key word, and hope that all yogis can take up the pursuit of balance as their goal by seeking to understand it and subsequently allow a teacher to assist in that endeavor. Our Western culture doesn't help a lot in this regard, as it tends to polarize us.

    I wrote a long post on my articles page about difficulties for Westerners in Eastern spiritual practice that goes a lot deeper into some of these factors too.

    Thanks for the excellent comments everyone.
    Om Shanti,
    DurgaDas
    www.silentmotion.org

Recent topics in "All Yoga"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
gift of pretty pictures> Briggi 0 Yesterday, 11:02 PM
A Christmas Mantra Sam 0 Yesterday, 9:30 PM
The Elephant Headed God : Ganesh / Ganapati in pre Vedic India... offlineK 87 December 20, 2009
backbends! CALI 4 December 19, 2009